Standard
- 5 analyses per monthPlanned
- Core saved strategy historyPlanned
- Standard research queuePlanned
Maple imports your trading strategy, backtests it against real market data, and runs a full validation stack to answer the only question that matters: can this result actually be trusted?
A strategy can post spectacular historical returns and still be built on luck, overfitting, or too little data. Maple scores the two separately — how well a strategy performed, and how much evidence supports that performance — so a beautiful equity curve never gets to speak for itself.
What the strategy did on historical data.
How much of that result survives scrutiny.
No script, no edited numbers — Maple running against real data.
An analysis isn't a one-off score — it's a record you build on.
Every analysis is saved in your library — results, settings, and the full Trust Report.
Refine a strategy over time and keep every version's results side by side.
Put two runs next to each other and see exactly what changed.
Take the complete analysis with you as a portable research package.
Maple is unfinished and in public beta. Strategy compatibility is still expanding.
The complete current Public Beta product at Maple’s lowest support price.
Current Public Beta access:
The same current Public Beta product for users who voluntarily want to contribute more toward building Maple.
Choosing Professional during beta does not currently unlock additional product features. It is an optional higher support contribution.
Current Public Beta access:
These are directional plans, not current entitlements. Every item below is unavailable during the current beta unless Maple announces otherwise.
No automatic price increase will occur without advance notice and consent. Cancel anytime. Unsupported compatibility submissions remain free and unlimited.
Every strategy takes the same path. No shortcuts, no cherry-picking — the same tests, in the same order, every time.
Paste Pine Script or describe the strategy in plain English.
Maple parses it into a structured, testable specification.
The strategy runs against real historical market data.
The full validation stack stress-tests the result.
Performance and evidence quality, scored separately.
The complete analysis lands in your research library.
Line up versions and rival strategies side by side.
Take the full report with you.
Six independent ways of asking the same question: does the evidence hold?
Tested on data the strategy never saw.
Re-validated across rolling windows of time.
Thousands of resampled outcome paths.
Behavior across different market conditions.
Sensitivity to small parameter changes.
Depth, duration, and recovery of losses.
A real strategy imported into Maple: Legend BUY/SELL. On the surface, the backtest is outstanding. The Trust Report tells a more complete story.
Every performance number above is real — Maple computed them. But performance only describes what happened on one slice of history. When the validation stack searched for independent evidence to support those numbers, it found too little to bear their weight.
So Maple scores the performance honestly, scores the evidence honestly, and withholds the grade. Not because the strategy is bad — because the available data can't yet prove it's good.
That's the difference between a backtest and research.
The original Trust Report example above uses a verified Maple result. The visualizations below are clearly marked synthetic previews of additional research views.
A distribution-first view of how one strategy could behave across 500 simulated outcome paths.
Equity, loss depth, and time-to-recovery shown together so risk is not reduced to one headline number.
These visualizations use synthetic values to demonstrate Maple’s research presentation. They are not user results, investment performance, or a promise of future returns.
Maple's public knowledge base — guides, methodology, and reference, in plain English.
Every trading tool can render an equity curve that goes up and to the right. Maple exists for the harder question underneath it — whether the evidence actually supports the result. That's a slower, humbler kind of research. We think it's the only kind worth doing.
Maple started from a simple frustration: most trading tools make strategies look impressive without helping you understand whether they're actually reliable.
It's being built to slow the process down, ask better questions, and make research feel understandable instead of intimidating.
Maple is built by Noah, out of a real interest in trading research, markets, and quantitative testing — and shaped by the discipline of the mountains: patience, humility, and preparation.
It's early. But the mission is clear: help people make better research decisions before risking capital.